[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: clashing version numbers.

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:18:45 +0000

On 26 November 2010 23:31, Roedy Green <roedyg_at_mindprod.com> wrote:
> I think it would be simpler if Tortoise Subversion just tracked the same underlying Subversion version number.
> If for some reason you had to issue two versions for the same Subversion, use a -a or -2 suffix.
> Several times I have tripped over that difference. The proper association is then completely obvious.

It took a while to work out what you are talking about - the tracking
of the TortoiseSVN version and the Subversion library version, as
opposed to the version of your files which is what subversion is all

This has already been discussed at length if you search the mailing
lists. Yes the association would be obvious, but they are 2 separate
programs and there is no logical reason to bind them to the same
version number. Almost every other Subversion client has its own
version numbering system, and we have shot ourselves in the foot by
not doing the same as it now leads to this confusion.


:       ___
:  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
:   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
:   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-11-27 01:18:54 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.