On 04.04.2010 19:28, Steve Borho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The TortoiseHg project has been using your TortoisePlink application
> as our default ssh transport for a couple of years. A while ago some
> performance problems [1] were raised with it and just recently I had
> the opportunity to investigate in more detail. I compared a clone[2]
> operation using several tools and configurations, and this is what I
> found (apologies for ascii table art):
>
> openssh -C: 0:30
> openssh: 1:10
> Plink: 1:20
> paramiko: 2:00
> TortoisePlink: 4:00
>
> I built Plink and TortoisePlink myself to get the tip version of each.
> The clone time for both Plink and TortoisePlink was unchanged when
> using the -C compression option. I suspect the compression was only
> being used for upstream direction, but that's speculation on my part.
>
> The executive summary is there seems to be a lot to gain from pulling
> the tip of Plink into TortoisePlink.
I'm reluctant to update plink. They have a time machine on their server
so you're never sure if you really get the latest release.
See this thread for details:
http://groups.google.com/group/tortoisesvn/browse_thread/thread/f2a890f517b835bc/b19072c65874f1bd?lnk=gst&q=0.60#b19072c65874f1bd
That said:
if you have a patch against plink 0.60 (if it really *is* 0.60 and not a
beta), please send it here.
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2478768
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-04-04 19:36:24 CEST