[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Auto-close: Suggestion for new behavior

From: void pointer <rcdailey_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:53:40 -0600

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> void pointer wrote:
> > I have a particular type of "auto-close" behavior that I find a need for
> > that is not exactly supported by TortoiseSVN 1.5.9.
> >
> > I want all local operations to close, and all remote operations that do
> > not involve a merge, delete, or *remote* add. Local adds should not
> > count as remote adds and thus should close.
> >
> > The interesting thing here is that we can easily replace the autoclose
> > combo box with a collection of check boxes. For example, you can have 2
> > auto-close sections: Local and Remote. The GUI would look something like
> > the image attached. Perhaps by providing auto-close functionality in the
> > way that my mockup does, we eliminate any future need to provide yet
> > more auto-close combinations.
> >
> > Let me know what you think of this Stefan. If I have time and if we come
> > to an agreement on something, I may help out and implement this for you.
>
> Good idea. But some comments on your screenshot:
>
> * the wording is a little bit unclear. it doesn't mention that
> if an action which is not checked for autoclose forces the dialog
> to stay open and prevent the autoclose
> * local operations can also have warnings and errors

These are all very valid points. However, the mockup was for demonstration
purposes only and by no means was meant to be an accurate final
representation of what the dialog or panel would look like.

> From what I remember, you wanted this because the 'add' you did locally
> did not autoclose the dialog. But in 1.6, adding files won't even show a
> dialog anymore. So maybe this improvement is not really necessary.

Not only this, but I wanted *all* local operations to close as well as
anything that remotely did not have any deletes, adds, or merges, or
conflicts. If this can be achieved in 1.6 with the changes you've mentioned
then my problem is solved. However, I have to ask, how many people actually
email you asking for a specific auto-close setup? If you get a lot of these,
setting up auto-close settings like I've demonstrated in my mock-up would
provide support for *all* possible combinations and thus fixes any future
combination requests.

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=1272437

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-03-05 15:53:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.