Re: TortoiseSVN Notification: vendor branches (steveking)
From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:57:39 +0000
On 14/03/2008, TortoiseSVN <issues_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org> wrote:
Moving discussion onto dev list to avoid cluttering the tracker.
> After checking svn_load_dirs.pl, I think we should use another approach, basically only working on working copies.
This sounds like a major operation. Something new and exciting for 1.6 :-)
> I'm not sure if it would be a good idea to try and get a diff first from the vendor wc to where it was created (to get the diff of all changes the user applied to the vendor branch) and later apply that patch again or do a merge. Because personally, I've never done that before (i.e., first committed the external library without changes, then applied my changes and committed again - I've always added my changes **before** I did the first commit).
Vendor branches as described in the subversion book operate a little
Simon
-- ___ oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.orgReceived on 2008-03-14 22:57:55 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.