Re: Merge description in the docs
Simon Large wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm still trying to get my head around the reintegrate merge. Please
> stop me when I go wrong.
> I am developing a new feature, so I create a branch from trunk and
> start hacking away. To avoid potential conflicts I want to keep it
> synced up to trunk and the easiest way to do that now is to use
> reintegrate, merging from the trunk URL into my branch WC.
> After much hacking my branch is done and I want to merge back to
> trunk. I use the reintegrate merge for this too, but this time merging
> from the branch URL into my trunk WC.
> In order for this to work everyone working on the branch *must* be
> using a 1.5 client in order to record the mergeinfo. In order for this
> to work efficiently we must be using a 1.5 server, although a pre-1.5
> will do it but possibly very slowly.
> We have 2 other merge options. Merge a range would also work for
> syncing the branch to trunk, and it uses the mergeinfo too so there is
> no need to specify a range. But the primary role for this feature now
> is cherry picking merges. It may be needed if the specific conditions
> for a reintegrate merge are not met.
> Merge 2 trees does what it always did and is now of limited use. It
> does not take account of merge tracking information.
> Are we getting there?
I think you got it right, yes. But maybe you could ask Mark Phippard or
on the Subversion list for confirmation?
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2008-03-08 08:43:28 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev