[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision graph curiosities

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:27:33 +0000

On 19/02/2008, Stefan.Fuhrmann_at_etas.com <Stefan.Fuhrmann_at_etas.com> wrote:
> "Simon Large" <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com> wrote on 03.01.2008
> 01:11:37:
>
> > > > 2. For the particular tree I am looking at which only has 1 branch
> and
> > > > 1 tag, the group branches together button makes no change to the
> > > > graph, but it does change the top offset.
> > >
> > > Depending on the data, this may be correct behavior. Could you provide
> > > the corresponding screenshots (if the graph is big, a picture showing
> only
> > > the revision numbers should do).
> >
> > These graphs are really simple.
> > revgraph1.png - without group-branches set
> > revgraph2.png - with group-branches set
>
> The graphs are correct because the revision ranges of the two branches
> don't overlap. Therefore, sorting rows by revision yields the same result
> as grouping by branch.

Yes, that's what I was expecting. I said they were simple ;-)
>
> r12162 fixes the additional empty line at the top of the graph.

Thanks. That's the difference I was (unclearly) pointing out.

Simon

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-19 23:27:41 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.