Re: Ignoring versioned Files/Folders

On 22/11/2007, Blackwell <blackwell@nexgo.de> wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have read what has been said in the past about ignoring versioned
> files, that they shouldn't be versioned in the first place and that
> the file should be added under a different name, as a template, to
> be modified in every checked, manually or via script.
>
> I like to present a few arguments against this (oddly puristic)
> point of view (I also added this as a feature request to the
> subversion issue tracker, issue 3028

Good luck! AFAICT you have not discussed this at all on the subversion
mailing lists, so how did you find a buddy to agree to entering this
in the svn issue tracker? You can expect that issue to be summarily
deleted the next time the subversion devs check through the new
issues.

> but since we are using
> TortoiseSVN exclusively I would be helped with support for this in
> TortoiseSVN already):

TortoiseSVN supports what subversion supports. We don't use a
customized version of the subversion libraries.

Simon

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org