Re: More feedback on merge wizard

Alexander Klenin wrote:
> On 11/7/07, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why do you think you have to manually enter a revision range there?
>>> Because I get conflicts otherwise.
>>> Will try to create a reproduction recipe on a test repository tomorrow.
>>> Form the description you gave this sounds like an SVN bug.
>> Reproduction recipe would be fine, yes. Otherwise it would be hard to
>> find a bug (if there is one).
>
> Attached is a test repository. To reproduce:
>
> 1) Checkout 'trunk' from test repo.
> 2) Try to merge 'branches/b1', shift-selecting both revisions from the
> log dialog.
> Tortoise fills 'revision range' field with '7,5' which is backwards, but,
> as you said, it actually does not matter, as both '7,5' and '5,7'
> seem to produce identical
> bogus conflict.
> The workaround is to manually enter '5-7' as a range.

Thanks for the reproduction recipe.
I think this is fixed now: I've updated to the latest Subversion trunk
(r27714) and I don't get any conflicts at all with the merge.
I've also compared the merge result with '7,5', '5,7', and '5-7' with
identical results.

Please try the next nightly build (will commit the svn update soon, I'm
currently testing some other stuff...) and let me know if you still have
the same issue.

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org