Re: 3 propositions for evolutions

Scott Nicolson wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that the actual problem is that while merge conflicts
>> are available for review and possible rejection of updates,
>> successfully merged files are not, yet there are cases when
>> successful textual merge results in semantic conflict.
>> I doubt it is possible to implement in TSVN without Subversion
>> support, but I think correct solution would be to add "Use mine/theirs
>> version" menu item to successfully merged files in update dialog
>> similar to "Resolve using mine/theirs" item for conflicted files.
>> "Use theirs" will be equivalent to "Revert", but "Use mine" should
>> preserve local modifications made before update (which is IMHO the
>> essence to the original poster's wish).
>
> Bingo. This would solve the problem also. That way we could see the
> changes resulting from the merge.

http://tortoisesvn.net/node/241

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org