Re: Re: Suggestion: Branch/tag-dialog change

On 6/22/06, Hans-Emil Skogh <Hans-Emil.Skogh@tritech.se> wrote:

> > While I agree with you that in general, creating a branch/tag directly
> > from HEAD is bad (someone else could commit while you don't expect it),
> > I'm not sure if we should fill in the revision of the working copy. As
> > you might know, there just is no single working copy revision. We'd have
> > to do the same as SubWCRev does now (find the highest 'last committed'
> > revision), which takes a while to compute.
> > Thoughts?
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to get the revision in the same way as it is done on
> the TSVN-tab on the explorer properties page?

That one just shows the 'last-committed' revision of the *selected*
item. But most of the time, you have files with a higher revision in
your working copy somewhere.
Try it:
* check out a working copy (assume it's at revision 100)
* modify a file below the root foler, commit
* check the 'last committed' revision of the root folder: it's 100
* but the file you just committed has the revision 101.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org