[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Suggestion: Branch/tag-dialog change

From: <jason_at_subversus.org>
Date: 2006-06-21 17:26:00 CEST

-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Russell Hind
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:25 AM
To: dev@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Branch/tag-dialog change

> But I still think auto-branching from HEAD is bad because of the race
condition mentioned previously.

Well, once again, in SVN as a whole (and every source control system I've
used) if you do not specify a version to branch / tag from, you
automatically branch from the youngest version.

My whole point in providing scenarios, playing devil's advocate, etc., etc.,
is to make the point that consistency is a Good Thing. You may not like the
way that the svn command line client does it, but it still does the same
thing (perform operations on HEAD by default) consistently throughout the
entire system. Trying to buck the norm just because 2 people think it's a
good idea doesn't make it Right.

If you really want to make this argument, try taking your suggestion that
revs always be specified to the svn dev mailing list. I'm sure they'd
appreciate it.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 21 17:31:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.