[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Inconsistency in Tortoise.pot

From: Jan Normann Nielsen <lists_at_dubbekarl.dk>
Date: 2006-03-20 15:00:33 CET

Stefan Küng skrev:
> Jan Normann Nielsen wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> From Tortoise.pot:
>>
>> msgid "Locking failed because a newer version exists!\nDo you want to
>> update and try again?"
>>
>> I think we agreed long time ago that we should use the word
>> "revision" instead of "version".
>
> That's the text which the Subversion API returns as the error for the
> failed lock. I just added the newline and the question.
> And it's not that a newer *revision* exists but a newer *version* of
> that file you try to lock - in this context, that's not the same.
Ok, my mistake. Wouldn't it make more sense to specify:

"Locking failed because a newer version of the file exists!"

so that noone gets confused.

Best wishes,
Jan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 20 15:01:11 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.