[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: TSVNCache cache?

From: Leon Zandman <lzandman_at_lode.nl>
Date: 2006-03-15 15:28:13 CET

> Why is SVN less suitable for binary files? I revision
> them all the time.

Ofcourse it is no problem to add binary files to SVN; I do it myself all
the time. But I was talking about VERY LARGE binary files.

I know of two reasons why it MIGHT be a problem:

1) The delta engine in SVN works better for plain text files than for
binary files. I think this is because binary files tend to differ more
between two revisions than text files.

2) SVN keeps a base copy of every file in your working copy in the
".svn" directory, so if you checkout a very large file it will exist at
least twice on your hard disk. I can imagine this can be problematic.
        
Greetings,

Leon Zandman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 15 15:29:07 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.