Stefan Küng wrote:
> Lübbe Onken wrote:
>> Leon Zandman wrote:
>>
>>> Seems to me like that repo has quite some downtime. Maybe you should
>>> switch TSVN to SourceForge? They have SVN support now.
>>
>> And with Steve's commit frequency we would skyrocket to rank #1 in the
>> list
>> of most active projects ;-)
>>
>> Sourceforge offered us to be part of the SVN beta test program, but at
>> that
>> time we declined because collab.net seemed to have everything up and
>> running.
>
> If we switch to sourceforge with the repo, what would keep us on
> tigris.org? We don't use their issue tracker because they refuse to
> change the config so that only people with project roles can create new
> issues (something even the Subversion guys find *very* annoying). The
> FAQ and our docs already are on sourceforge, the downloads too.
> The only thing we still use from tigris.org is the mailing list (and
> that's a little bit better than the one on sourceforge, which has the
> tendency to keep mails for some time and then send them all at once -
> I've seen that a lot, it usually keeps them for 15-30 minutes, which
> isn't very good for discussing stuff).
>
> Has anyone heard about how reliable the repos on sourceforge are? What's
> the downtime? Maybe someone knows the average downtime of the CVS repos
> there?
When we have talked about moving the FAQ etc before, some people (Mark
Phippard was one I think) commented that SourceForge is really no better
than tigris for downtime. Also, who is responsible for backups of the
repository?
Simon
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 8 00:12:52 2006