[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PROPOSAL] Yet another revert option

From: Harwell, Sam <catchall_at_djss.net>
Date: 2006-02-05 14:11:49 CET

Simon Large wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> As this same question has come up on the list several times, I wonder
> if it merits a new context menu entry in the log dialog.
>
> "Revert to this revision"
>
> When revision 'N' is selected, does a merge HEAD:N, thereby making rev
> N the new HEAD when committed.
>
> Disabled when multiple revisions selected.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Simon
>
If I needed to revert something that was committed, this proposed way is
the first place I would look for that ability. If I didn't find it
there, I would assume the software didn't offer that feature.

I've never needed to revert one of my SVN repositories, but I've needed
to in Perforce twice now in a week. I'm much more comfortable with TSVN,
and very new to Perforce, so when I tried to revert via the changelist
view in Perforce and didn't find that option, I ended up doing the whole
thing manually. :(

As far as "safety" of a revert, this is very different than the
situation I've mentioned a couple times in the past. A revert in the
repository can always be undone. (If I revert revision 13 to what was
12, it becomes 14 and 13 remains the one you reverted). Safety is only
an issue in things like a working copy revert which can't be undone.
That's why I've been trying to stress the importance of making the WC
revert dialog select NONE by default, not all.

Sam

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Sun Feb 5 15:24:16 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.