Nathan Kidd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just did a command-line 'svn up' in a sizable working copy (21,000
> files, 2,000 dirs, 1,500 files actually updated) and observed that
> while this update was going on (a period of 5+ minutes) and for a
> minute or so after 'svn up' finished, TSVNCache.exe was using 20-50%
> CPU and any browsing in explorer was quite slow to respond. (E.g.
> click a folder in the tree view and it takes several seconds before
> any files are drawn in the right pane). After TSVNCache calmed down to
> its normal 0-5% CPU then explorer immediately was back to normal and
> the same directories that took 5-10 seconds to display before were
> displayed instantly again.
>
It really reads like your system was IO bound. Even if the cache was
consuming 90%, I would expect the remaining 10% on a 2.4 GHz system
should be enough to responsively paint the desktop etc.
As an experiment, have a look at the HDD defragmentation.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 10 01:21:31 2006