[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Release plan

From: Joseph Galbraith <galb_at_vandyke.com>
Date: 2005-11-30 15:59:30 CET

Stefan Küng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So Subversion 1.3.0RC4 is out, which means the 1.3.0 release isn't
> that far away anymore. It's time to think about the next TSVN release.
>
> My plan (subject to change, please comment!):
>
> * get the cache to a state where Peter is ok with it (hmmm - maybe
> we'd have to make the release earlier, people might get angry if we
> don't release for another two years ;)
> * change the build to use VS.NET2005 (that also means that people
> using the free VC-Express can build TortoiseBlame, SubWCRev, ResText,
> ... without any problems)
> * Maybe even get it to build for 64-bit
>
> Then, when Subversion 1.3.0 gets released:
> * create a branch from trunk, named "1.3.x".
> * release an RC1 from that branch
> * wait a week to give people time to test RC1
> * fix bugs found in RC1, merge them back to 1.3.x
> * if fixedbugsinRC > 3 OR peoplerequestinganotherRC goto -3
> * release 1.3.0
>
> Keep working on trunk, implementing new features. But 1.3.x releases
> will be made from the 1.3.x branch, not from trunk anymore. And they
> will *only contain bugfixes*, no new features or other changes.

With this model (which is new from what we have done, right?),
do you keep the trunk building against the SVN 1.3.x branch or
do you build our trunk against the SVN trunk?

I'm not opposed to either one, just curious what you were
thinking.

Thanks,

Joseph

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 30 16:29:44 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.