Re: Crash in Revision Graph using latest nightly (4734)

Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote:

>> What still remains (using r4911) is...
>> "r42: partly correct, parent path got deleted"
>> The 12-points-solution would draw 2 nodes which show the deletion of
>> each path
>> (parent /tags/5.2.2 AND child /tags/5.2.2/5.2.x)
>
> That's correct as it is now. Because /tags/5.2.2 got deleted, our
> "watched" path /tags/5.2.2/5.2.x got deleted in that revision too. And
> since the graph shows the nodes with the URL's of the watched path,
> that's correct.

Sure, but /tags/5.2.2 is also watched and deleted. So not showing that
/tags/5.2.2 got deleted is at least _incomplete_. But I would say this
situation is very _uncommon_. Keeping in mind that there is no "copy-to"
attribute and you have to reversely create that tree there always will
be some _incompleteness_ under some conditions.

So nevermind and thanks for your work so far.

Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 11 17:32:05 2005