[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Feature Request: Make switches safer.

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-09-07 19:23:03 CEST

Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote on 09/07/2005 01:08:09 PM:

> Greg Stevenson wrote:
> > I understand the problem. I will submit to subversion, because I feel
> > this is one case that fails the ACID test of the environment even if
> > repository is still ok. Precheck by TSVN with Continue/Cancel warning
> > would still be nice even if not perfect. Biggest issue would be
> > efficiently determining what folders would be removed without a lot of
> > SVN traffic. Maybe you could place this on that big back-burner list
> > every project seems to have.
> What do you mean with "big back-burner list"?

I think he means put it somewhere like the issue tracker so that if the
API's available to you ever change you remember that there was a request
for something like this once. Personally, I prefer to not enter items
that cannot be done and let them come back on their own in the future when
perhaps they can. It wastes a lot of collective time to have an open
issue in an issue tracker that cannot really be done.


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 7 19:25:48 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.