Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote on 09/07/2005 01:08:09 PM:
> Greg Stevenson wrote:
> > I understand the problem. I will submit to subversion, because I feel
> > this is one case that fails the ACID test of the environment even if
the
> > repository is still ok. Precheck by TSVN with Continue/Cancel warning
> > would still be nice even if not perfect. Biggest issue would be
> > efficiently determining what folders would be removed without a lot of
> > SVN traffic. Maybe you could place this on that big back-burner list
> > every project seems to have.
>
> What do you mean with "big back-burner list"?
I think he means put it somewhere like the issue tracker so that if the
API's available to you ever change you remember that there was a request
for something like this once. Personally, I prefer to not enter items
that cannot be done and let them come back on their own in the future when
perhaps they can. It wastes a lot of collective time to have an open
issue in an issue tracker that cannot really be done.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 7 19:25:48 2005