RE: [TSVN] Installer issues?

Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>
>> Don't worry, less than 50% have voted for "well done".
>
> That's what still gives me hope :-)
>
>> As nobody has said what voting system is in use I suggest this is an
>> elimination runoff. If we stopped now we would drop "rare" and
>> re-vote. If the votes stay as they are we then drop "medium" and
>> move into a final vote between "well done" and "medium rare". Of
>> course as rare currently has 0 votes we could go straight to the
>> final vote.
>
> Good idea. Shall we vote on this?

That gets my vote!

Seriously, this is an interesting subject to look into (the last US election
sparked my curiosity). The trouble is agreeing on the method to use _before_
starting the process - in this case you would like a
run-off/elimination/multiple vote system as it's more likely to give the
result _you_ want and Stefan wants first past the post as it will probably
give the result _he_ wants. That's one of the troubles with democracy - most
people are in favour of it but no ones quite sure what it is.

Bill

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
*** Confidentiality Notice *** Proprietary/Confidential
Information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates
may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient
indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for
delivery of this message to such person), or you think for
any reason that this message may have been addressed to you
in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message
to anyone else.  In such case, you should destroy this
message and are asked to notify the sender by reply email.