Norbert Unterberg wrote:
>2005/7/14, Simon Large <simon@skirridsystems.co.uk>:
>
>
>
>>Difficult problem. I am not sure what Will intended when he said the
>>cache should not have a timeout. How is it supposed to pick up the
>>changes in that case? What triggers a fresh crawl of the WC?
>>
>>
>
>I believe there is no need to do another crawl. When the problem
>happens in my WC, the folder overlays of deeper nested folders are
>correct (that means their state is in the cache), the status is just
>not reported to the higher directory levels.
>
>Norbert
>
>
In that case, maybe not a re-crawl but a propagation of the status up
the chain. To be triggered when the status change is detected.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 15 09:15:03 2005