Re: [TSVN] Spicing up the docs

Simon Large wrote:
> Lübbe Onken wrote:
>
>>I just had a small go at including the glossary into the TSVN docs. I
>>think it would be a good idea if we reviewed our <fistterm>s and
>>added the necessary ones to the glossary. Currently there are too
>>many firstterms which are IMO placed without thought.
>>We could even link to the glossary definitions from inside the docs.
>>See http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Glossaries.html for more info.
>>
>>Whaddayathink?

Looks good! One question though:
are the words in the glossary automatically linked? (i.e. the word
somewhere in the docs links to the glossary entry). If yes, how?

> Sounds good to me, but I think it should wait until after the 1.2.1
> release, which should be in a few days. Don't want to release a
> half-baked glossary.

That won't be a problem. We didn't have a glossary before, so people
won't complain if they get a rudimentary one the first time.

> While we're about it, our indexing is not that good either.
>
> Something else I was thinking it would be nice to have is an image of
> the main context menu with hotspots linked to the relevant helpfile
> entries. Click on the menu entry to jump to the help for that item. But
> I think that may be too difficult in docbook.

Check out <AreaSpec>...

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org