Re: [TSVN] FAQ entries

2005/5/31, Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>:

> Technically, the above is correct, as Subversion does not have
> built-in Kerberos support.
>
> But it's hardly appropriate for a FAQ. How about something like:
> "Kerberos authentication (the authentication mechanism used in newer
> versions of Windows) can be integrated to work seamlessly with
> Subversion by using Apache on the server side along with
> mod_auth_sspi.

That would be wrong!
sspi != kerberos.

Kerberos means, you don't have to enter username/password anymore.

> > You can use NTLM modules for Apache, or any other authentication software compatible with the Kerberos protocol to authenticate against a Windows domain, Active Directory, etc.
>
> Is this correct? I know that NTLM != Kerberos.. Is mod_auth_sspi a NTLM module?
> And is this the module referred to?

Here, the 'kerberos' part should be removed.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org