SteveKing wrote:
> Simon Large wrote:
>
>>> You can still recursively apply the lock, but you'll have to type
>>> the property-name manually instead of choosing it from a list - I
>>> just tested this with the nightly of 23-may-2005. The property is
>>> not applied to directories, but it's applied to all files.
>>
>>
>> This is a valid point. Even though svn:needs-lock is a file property,
>> should we allow users to apply it to a folder anyway in order to
>> apply it to the files within, and to allow recursive setting?
>
> We don't forbid to add those properties on folders. We just don't show
> them in the combobox as valid properties. That's because they're only
> valid if the 'recursive' option is set, and even then they're not set
> on the selected folder but on the files below it.
> So, I think documenting this should be enough. After all, user's who
> don't know what they're doing shouldn't be helped with setting such
> props recursively.
If I set tsvn:logminsize recursively it gets set only on folders. If I
set svn:needs-lock recursively, it gets set only on files. How does
subversion know whether to add a recursive property to all files or just
folders?
I just noticed another 'feature'. If I set a folder property
recursively, sub-folders (sometimes?) don't get a modified overlay, even
after F5, but they do show up in check for modifications.
Build 3402 on Win2K.
Simon
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 24 19:44:09 2005