> Patrick Oor wrote:
>> I am involved in an evaluation of TortoiseSVN for our development
>> group. I like the revision graph functionality and I expect it
>> to be of great value to our group. At the same time, I have some
>> concerns, namely: 1) its performance is sometimes painfully slow
> Stefan King wrote:
> TSVN has to fetch _all_ log messages including the involved paths
> (the same information you get if you would show the log dialog for
> the repository root). Depending on how many revisions your
> repository has, this can take a while to load.
Patrick, if speed is a big issue and you're using the http:// access
method over the LAN, then consider using svnserve (svn://). It is
*much* faster at ls and log operations. Some tests I was doing
yesterday on our repository show svn:// to be 5x faster (5s vs. 25s [1])
to view the full repository log (tested over the LAN). This is is the
difference between usable and unusable in my books.
I don't know how much this holds true when going over the internet.
-Nathan
__________________________________________
[1]
Tested on a Xeon 3ghz 1GB, Win2003, svn 1.1.3. over 100Mb lan.
svn log svn://server/repo -v -r1:HEAD
gives output with 3300 revisions, 43,000 lines, 2.2MB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 13 18:26:07 2005