Nick Gilbert <nick@x-rm.com> wrote on 03/22/2005 11:57:10 AM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > At the
> > same time, that could be a problem as you spend all of your time
fixing
> > cache bugs instead of implementing the new 1.2 features.
>
> You make it sound like fixing the bugs first and adding features later
> is some kind of problem. Fixing bugs before adding new features should
> ALWAYS be the correct order! So if there's any risk that there's new
> code in TSVN that hasn't been thoroughly tested yet then my vote is for
3.
No, that is not it at all. There are already a number of us that run
nightly builds and are testing the cache and other new features. We
report bugs and Stefan fixes them. If this were released to the general
public, however, and there were some bugs we had not found yet, then
Stefan could become saturated with requests, the urgency of which would be
far greater than what we have currently. He would be pressured to do
another 1.1.x release to fix those bugs.
My point was that the cache works very well and is overall pretty stable.
If it were released to the general public we would probably find the
remaining bugs quicker, it is just that the nature of those bugs (if they
exist) could overwhelm the 1.2 release process depending on the number and
severity.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 22 18:06:24 2005