[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Bug in our issue tracker?

From: Simon Large <slarge_at_slarge.plus.com>
Date: 2005-03-10 17:35:37 CET

Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>>> I didn't want 15 odd columns that don't provide additional
>>> information. If something's not assigned, it's new...
>> ... or closed, or needs additional testing.
> We know who is responsible until the issue is closed or someone else
> takes responsibility. Do we need more?

But how do you know when the issue is closed? Sometimes we forget to
fill in the % complete before closing.

>> And how useful are the
>> number of attachments and comments columns?
> They are not really important, that's true. At least they tell me
> whether it's worth taking a closer look at an issue :-)
> Tell me which colums you think are important. Most of the standard
> fiels can be a column. Maybe I'm missing something.

I think it's about right, but I think status is more useful than you do


  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 10 17:34:55 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.