Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> Why? You always merge into a WC and you can use "Check for
> Modifications" to review the changes. After the review you commit them
> if everything is fine.
I need to keep the "review" and "merge" steps separate.
They are done by different people at different times.
The "review" includes a refactor, resulting in further
development on the branch. The reviewer needs to inspect
changes made on the branch, and then may make further changes.
The author is then interested in the set of changes made
on the branch by the reviewer. Only after all this is the
code ready to be merged to the main trunk.
Thanks.
Warning: Copyright ResMed. Where the contents of this email and/or attachment includes materials prepared by ResMed, the use of those
materials is subject exclusively to the conditions of engagement between ResMed and the intended recipient.
This communication is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.
By the use of email over the Internet or other communication systems, ResMed is not waiving either confidentiality of, or legal
privilege in,the content of the email and of any attachments.
If the recipient of this message is not the intended addressee, please call ResMed immediately on +61 2 9886 5000 Sydney, Australia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 9 09:25:32 2005