[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[TSVN] Wording for autoclosing (was: Small bug in commit dialog)

From: SteveKing <stefankueng_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-02-10 14:35:29 CET

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:56:21 -0000, Simon Large <slarge@blazepoint.co.uk> wrote:

> Oh no they're not !
>
> > - Close Manually
> > --> NEVER close automatically
> Safest - always get to see the result
>
> > - Auto-close if no errors
> > --> only close if there are no errors
> But do close if there are conflicts - User action required
[snip]

Ok, I see now what you mean. I've changed the order of those options
according to your first post.

> >> Should add and delete be included at the same level as merge? It does
> >> not require any action, but it is likely to be something you should
> >> know about if you also want to know about successful merges.
> >
> > Not really. Merging _might_ break your code logically, but an add or
> > delete usually can't do that.
>
> I am fairly certain it will break the build if I rename SVN.cpp to
> DeleteMe.txt

If that breaks your build, then a simple update (without an
add/merge/delete) can too. Because then the other person didn't check
before committing.

But, nice guy that I am (;)), I've included adds/deletes too.
(revision 2648).

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 10 14:36:16 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.