[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[TSVN] Re: TSVN Merge issue vs. "Feature Branches" in SVN boo k

From: Jens Scheidtmann <Jens.Scheidtmann_at_bayerbbs.com>
Date: 2005-01-13 16:08:46 CET

"Hughes, Bill" <Bill.Hughes@cox.co.uk> writes:

> Will Dean wrote:
> ..snip..
> > He's talking about reordering it, so that the order goes:
> >
> > Source:
> > From:
> > To:
> > Destination:
> >
> > I think this makes sense, but I would also like to see 'from'
> > and 'to'
> > changed to something less easily mistaken for 'source' and
> > 'destination'.
>
> How about
> Source:
> Old:
> New:
> Destination:

My feeling is that "old" and "new" don't not have (the right)
connotation (for german speakers: die richtige Assoziation).

What about:

Create patch
     using base:
     to:
Apply patch to:

or

Create patch
     starting with:
     ending with:
Merge (patch) into:

I would prefer the second (maybe use "Apply patch to" --- but then
there's no mention of merging).

Jens

-- 
Jens.Scheidtmann@bayerbbs.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 13 16:09:34 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.