[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] CString vs std::string

From: Will Dean <svn_at_indcomp.co.uk>
Date: 2004-12-22 13:40:07 CET

At 14:26 22/12/2004 +0200, you wrote:

>You have somehow chosen to use the run-time library and the Standard
>C++ Library from a DLL, while you can also have them linked into your
>executable. Here's the appropriate page from MSDN:

There is a grave danger that people are going to think you haven't a clue
what you're talking about.

The decision about whether to statically or dynamically link MFC/CRT/C++RT
is a subtle one. TSVN is dynamically linked, and I happen to think that's
the right decision. If you dynamically link MFC, you dynamically link the
whole lot.

You've asserted strongly and incorrectly that there's no DLL involved in
the STL. Now you've been shown to be wrong on that, you're claiming that
it's only involved because we've 'somehow chosen' to dynamically link the
application against CRT/MFC.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 22 13:40:59 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.