> > >>I guess the second option here is better. But should I
> add another
> > >>button as you suggested or add a checkbox with "stop on copy"?
> > >
> > >Yes, that sounds good.
> >
> > What exactly? The second button or the checkbox?
>
> The checkbox sounds good as well, I don't have a strong opinion.
When you select Show Log, doesn't TSVN do a --stop-on-copy already? So if
you click Yes in the modal dialog, when the command is processed, you will
see the same log messages as you already see? At least that is what I see in
the example I have made (I made a branch).
afaics in Subversion docs --stop-on-copy cannot be called several times to
implement a "--stop-on-copy Next" button giving you the logs in bunches
limited by each time the file has been copied/renamed... If possible my
suggestion would be "Get Next" and "Get all" buttons.
May I suggest using the word "Show" instead of "Get" for two reasons:
1. You have selected "Show Logs" so you are "showing" logs and not "getting"
logs in the first place.
2. In other Version Control Systems "Get" means "get a file" i.e. copy a
file to your WC. So to eliminate misunderstandings I think "Show" is better.
All the best
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 27 13:17:35 2004