SteveKing <steveking@gmx.ch> wrote on 10/27/2004 04:17:17 PM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > I hope this was somewhat tongue in cheek? I am on your side, I am
just
> > trying to explore the issue. I think I used poor wording and
apologize.
>
> Yes, sorry 'bout that. Sometimes I get a little cranky ;)
>
> > My point was that the overwhelming majority of those TSVN users you
> > describe would never run into this parm, the ones that do would be
ones
> > where someone decided they needed it. In those scenarios, I believe
that
>
> Not really. There are many users who would want such a list of open
> issues, but just as a help, _not_ to enforce a bug-ID. By enforcing it
> we would anger those users a lot, because they either can't use that
> feature or would be forced to use bogus ID's to commit certain changes.
But they would be separate properties and those users would just set one
and not the other!
Forgetting that we have set this all aside for now, if we used my idea of
allowing a client-side program to be run, I see that there would be two
distinct programs:
1) List of ID's. This program would produce a text file list of ID's.
TSVN would use the text file to create a UI.
2) Validation. This program would be passed in the ID's the user entered
or selected. The program would pass something back like "OK, "WARN" or
"ERR", and possibly a message to display as well. Only if ERR was passed
back would you stop the user.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 27 23:27:55 2004