SteveKing <stefankueng@gmail.com> wrote on 10/06/2004 09:31:29 AM:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:23:05 -0400, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com>
wrote:
> > SteveKing <stefankueng@gmail.com> wrote on 10/06/2004 09:21:12 AM:
> >
> > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:54:38 -0400, Mark Phippard
<markp@softlanding.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Did you download the most recent Subversion 1.1.0 Windows
binaries?
> > They
> > > > claim to have been compiled with HAVE_SETSOCKOPT. If so, then
post a
> > > > message to the list. Perhaps he had a pre-built Neon library and
it
> > > > didn't rebuild when he made the new binary?
> > >
> > > Downloaded them yesterday. But the readme doesn't mention the
> > > HAVE_SETSOCKOPT anywhere.
> >
> > Check out these two threads:
> >
> > http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-10/0165.shtml
> >
> > http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-10/0206.shtml
>
> So it seems it actually was compiled that way. Then I don't have any
> idea why TSVN would be faster...
My guess would be that he made a mistake and the change didn't "take".
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 6 16:42:14 2004