[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Performances of TSVN vs Subversion

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2004-10-06 15:23:05 CEST

SteveKing <stefankueng@gmail.com> wrote on 10/06/2004 09:21:12 AM:

> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:54:38 -0400, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com>
wrote:
>
> > Did you download the most recent Subversion 1.1.0 Windows binaries?
They
> > claim to have been compiled with HAVE_SETSOCKOPT. If so, then post a
> > message to the list. Perhaps he had a pre-built Neon library and it
> > didn't rebuild when he made the new binary?
>
> Downloaded them yesterday. But the readme doesn't mention the
> HAVE_SETSOCKOPT anywhere.

Check out these two threads:

http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-10/0165.shtml

http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-10/0206.shtml

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 6 16:32:17 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.