[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Re: [Subclipse-users] Select unversioned resources on commit

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:44:11 -0700

I do not believe anything has changed here. We included and select
unversioned files by default. There is a checkbox on the dialog that
says whether to show them at all. On some versions of Linux, there is
an SWT bug that prevents those checkboxes from showing, so we also put
everything on to the right-click menu which seems to work everywhere.
See attached screenshot (which unfortunately did not capture the
right-click menu popup as I had hoped it would).

Mark

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Jakub Niezgoda <qooban_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I know that it's very old topic, but I hope to get answer.
>
> I am using Subclipse 1.8.16. That parameter: "Select unversioned recources on commit" is not present in that version. Probably it was removed during that 6 years since the first post was written in that topic.
>
> IMHO it was very helpful option. In my case there are a lot of temporary files generated inside project. It is not efficient to declare ignored resources pattern for all of them or perform svn:ignore actions.
>
> I am wondering if it will be possible to get that checkbox (Select unversioned resources on commit) back?
>
>> On 6/5/07, Elliotte Harold <eharold at accoona dot com> wrote:
>> > This is a defect report:
>> >
>> > The preference to "Select unversioned resources on commit" should be enabled by default.
>> > Repeatedly I have been bitten by committing a new file and then only later discovering that it is
>> > not in the repository. I am given no warning that the commit has, for all intents and purposes,
>> >failed.
>> >
>> > Indeed I question the wisdom of including this prefernece at all. If I select a file and commit it,
>> > why would I not want it to be added to the repository? I suspect this preference could be
>> > eliminated completely.
>>
>> There was a time that it was the default and several users made
>> convincing arguments. Such as they had files they did not want to
>> commit and it is impossible to completely remove something once it was
>> committed etc...
>>
>> The preference is needed because Subclipse allows you to select
>> something like your top-level project folder and take the Commit
>> option. It then shows all the modified/unversioned resources in the
>> commit dialog. I agree there are situations where we ought to do
>> better. For example, adding an unversioned file to a change set in
>> the Synch view should Add it to version control. Also if you
>> specifically select a resource (your example) it would also make
>> sense.
>>
>> Feel free to file an enhancement in our issue tracker.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mark Phippard
>> http://markphip.blogspot.com/

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=3060339
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].

Screen_Shot_2013-07-12_at_6.41.09_AM.png
Received on 2013-07-12 15:44:19 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.