Re: [Subclipse-users] Could SVNKit be the default SVN implementation instead of JavaHL?

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Nick Boldt <nickboldt_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> So... if I simply remove
> org.tigris.subversion.clientadapter.javahl.feature from our installed
> feature set, the user experience will be simpler as then the default
> selected implementation will be SVNKit.

Yes, exactly. Just do not include the JavaHL feature in the install
and SVNKit will be the default (provided that you installed that
feature and the SVNKit library).

> I suppose that *is* better, but there will be no mention of JavaHL,
> leaving all JavaHL related activity as an exercise for the reader,
> should they so desire it.

Right. But given that they probably need to install the JavaHL RPM
and edit the ini file for the launcher to make the library available
this is probably what you wanted anyway.

--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=3057703
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].