[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

From: Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:32:01 -0700

Hi Steve,

Noticed that you have already fixed this one too. Where can I get a build
that include this fix for test?

Many thanks,


Steve Elsemore <selsemore_at_collab.net>
Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, <selsemore_at_tigris.org>, users
<users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>, Xiao Di Chen <xiaodic_at_cn.ibm.com>
02/04/2011 02:04 PM
Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in

Hi Weiping,

I’ve reopened issue 1236. I’ll see if I can fix it now.


On 2/2/11 4:33 PM, "Weiping Lu" <wlu_at_us.ibm.com> wrote:

Hi Mark/Stephen,

The case in http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236 <
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236> has been fixed.

But we have also hit the same scheduling rule violation with another
slightly different scenario (please also refer to 1236's case):

Here are the steps for reproducing the condition before making
Resource.move call:

(1) The SVN files checked out in the work-space has the following file

where element.xmi is a file under the sub-group folder.

(2) Use Eclipse's IFolder's create(boolean force, boolean local,
IProgressMonitor monitor) API to create the following one folder

(3) Now make the call to org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Resource.move
with the calling resource instance object associated with the file
"workspace-root\plugin-b\group\subgroup" and the destination path string
associated with the path "workspace-root\plugin-a\group\sub-group".

At step (3), we got the same scheduling rule violation thrown from the
call thread inside subeclipse similar as that of 1236.

Please let me if you need more info.



From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
To: users <users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>
Cc: Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, selsemore_at_tigris.org, Bingxue
Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen <xiaodic_at_cn.ibm.com>
Date: 01/28/2011 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in

Subclipse 1.6.17 was released earlier this week. It contains this fix.

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com <
mailto:wlu_at_us.ibm.com> > wrote:

Hi Stephen,

Can you or any person in Subeclipe team give us a date that this fix will
be available for download or update?

This would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,


From: Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM
To: selsemore_at_tigris.org <mailto:selsemore_at_tigris.org>
Cc: users_at_subclipse.tigris.org <mailto:users_at_subclipse.tigris.org> ,
Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen/China/IBM_at_IBMCN
Date: 01/25/2011 10:37 AM
Subject: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

Hi Stephen,

Thank you very much for quickly fixing the issue:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236 <
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236> .

Any advise that how we can get a build or updated version that contains
the fix?




To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-02-05 01:32:25 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.