[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

From: Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:33:39 -0700

Hi Mark/Stephen,

The case in http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236 has
been fixed.

But we have also hit the same scheduling rule violation with another
slightly different scenario (please also refer to 1236's case):

=====================================================
Here are the steps for reproducing the condition before making
Resource.move call:

(1) The SVN files checked out in the work-space has the following file
structure:

workspace-root\plugin-a
                            \plugin-b\group\sub-group\element.xmi
where element.xmi is a file under the sub-group folder.

(2) Use Eclipse's IFolder's create(boolean force, boolean local,
IProgressMonitor monitor) API to create the following one folder
        workspace-root\plugin-a\group

(3) Now make the call to org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Resource.move
with the calling resource instance object associated with the file
"workspace-root\plugin-b\group\subgroup" and the destination path string
associated with the path "workspace-root\plugin-a\group\sub-group".

At step (3), we got the same scheduling rule violation thrown from the
call thread inside subeclipse similar as that of 1236.
=====================================================

Please let me if you need more info.

Thanks,

Weiping

From:
Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
To:
users <users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>
Cc:
Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, selsemore_at_tigris.org, Bingxue
Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen <xiaodic_at_cn.ibm.com>
Date:
01/28/2011 10:58 AM
Subject:
Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in
SVNMoveDeleteHook

Subclipse 1.6.17 was released earlier this week. It contains this fix.

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com> wrote:

Hi Stephen,

Can you or any person in Subeclipe team give us a date that this fix will
be available for download or update?

This would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Weiping

From:
Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM
To:
selsemore_at_tigris.org
Cc:
users_at_subclipse.tigris.org, Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di
Chen/China/IBM_at_IBMCN
Date:
01/25/2011 10:37 AM
Subject:
1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

Hi Stephen,

Thank you very much for quickly fixing the issue:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236.

Any advise that how we can get a build or updated version that contains
the fix?

Regards,

Weiping

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2702089
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-02-03 01:33:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.