Why wouldn't you just take the option to hide the comment area
completely? This is a sticky setting.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Christian Sell <c.sell_at_byterefinery.de> wrote:
>> No, the History view is what you are after
>
> ugh, thanks for the info. Unfortunately that view - in particular the
> revision details in the lower part of the view - is basically unusable
> IMO. When it initially opens, the right half of that section is used
> by the comment (which is not described by any label, but one can
> derive it because the same information is already shown in the
> revision list above). In the left half, the interesting information
> (the affacted resource paths) is shown in a column of minimal default
> size, together with the "description", which rarely contains
> information, and a part of the table which is left completely empty.
>
> So, in order to use that view, I have to drag the comment pane
> completely to the right and resize the "affected paths" column every
> time I open the history view (I always close it after use). Not
> feasible if you ask me. Heavily due for a redesign
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2613645
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
>
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2613646
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-05-26 15:29:45 CEST