Re: [Subclipse-users] subversion without jdt

> I do not see any reason it would not just work. JDT is an optional
> dependency. I think just because we add some UI to the Java Package
> Explorer view. Maybe Eclipse 3.5 handles optional dependencies
> differently? Wants to install them?
>

i also did notice that in our plugins

I just wondered why is it if i install subclipse in our project

that sqlexplorer (sourceforge db eclipse plugin) is also coming alone
that i didnt select!

It seems that 3.5 does install optional dependencies when it can find them
in one of the update sites
when you update another thing!

So i think if you want to install subclipse without anything else
do disable all other (galileo and update3.5 sites) for a moment. So that 3.5
really cant find them.

I will see if there is already a bug for this open else i will make one.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2380335

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-08-05 10:15:37 CEST