Just an fyi ... we have made some fixes here that should speed this up
for you. I'll be posting a new build later for you to try. I'll post
again when it is available.
Mark
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Stephen Colebourne<scolebourne_at_joda.org> wrote:
>> The command I'd be looking for here is:
>>
>> svn mergeinfo --show-revs=eligible http://repo/svn/base/trunk@HEAD
>> http://repo/svn/base
>> /branches/1.0_at_HEAD
>>
>> Note how eclipseprojecta was removed from both. This is the command
>> we'd execute to get the eligible revisions to merge for all projects.
>
> Here are the results for the svn mergeinfo on the command line:
>
> /trunk to /branches/branch1 - quick, correct info for all projects
>
> /trunk/project to /branches/branch1/project - quick, correct info for one project
>
> /trunk/project to /branches/branch1 - slower, wrong as expected (all revisions since branch created)
>
> /trunk to /branches/branch1/project - quick, very slow (~2 minutes), wrong as expected (all revisions from rv1)
>
> Based on this, I really believe that the evidence points to Subclipse issuing the wrong command (the fourth one above). But why for me and not for you? Perhaps you could create a build with extra logging?
>
> Also I don't see why you wouldn't issue the svn mergeinfo at the level of each of the projects, and union the set of returned revision numbers, as doing it at the base level returns rv numbers that don't affect the selected projects.
>
> Stephen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2356065
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
>
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2358803
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-02 16:45:05 CEST