Re: Re: [Subclipse-users] Eclipse 3.4 gives "Unable to load default SVN Client"

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:51 PM, <webpost_at_tigris.org> wrote:
> I second the inclusion of a 64bit JavaHL.  many of our developers are now using 64bit operating
> systems.

There is still little reason to use a 64-bit JVM. You need a > 4GB
heap for Eclipse? Performance is a lot worse. Anyway, I do not have
a Windows 64-bit system. If someone wants to build and maintain it I
have no objection.

> I have been playing with getting the unreleased version of SVNKit 1.3.0 to work with Subclipse
> but have not managed to get passed the message "SVNKit(Pure Java) Not Supported with 1.6
> yet".
>
> Other than installing the plug-in to Eclipse do I need to change anything withing subclipse?

You'd have to checkout the code and put the support back. I've
completely removed the possibility of using it for now. When they
post a Beta, I will post it and put the code back.

I had to do it this way or there would be no way for anyone that had
the current SVNKit installed (even if they do not use it) to install
Subclipse 1.6.x because the dependencies would not be satisified.

There is a very easy answer here though. The ONLY difference between
Subclipse 1.6.x and 1.4.x are the Subversion 1.6 features. Since
SVNKit does not have these, if you want to use it, just use Subclipse
1.4.8.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=1446785
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].