>
> In some cases yes, in others no. It depends what is in the
> changesets. Changesets are based on revisions. If a single file was
> changed in revision 8, 9 and 10. It will only show in the changeset
> for revision 10. So you might be able to update to the revision 8
> changeset, but it will not include any of the changes for that file.
and that is a pitty
Why not update that file also to revision 8 and later on if i come to the
other changeset that has rev 10
do the update to 10?
>
>
> Likewise, it would not be possible to get the changes that happened in
> revision 10 without also getting the ones that happened in revisions 8
> and 9.
Yes i get this, i can understand that this is something that cant be changed
But it isnt a big problem because when i look at the changes i see them all.
So i do see them
>
>
> The cases where it does work is if revisions 8, 9 and 10 do not share
> anything in common with each other. Then you can update any of the
> changesets selectively and it works. As you say, if a folder is
> included, then all bets are off. You cannot update a folder to r8
> without also updating everything beneath the folder to that revision
> as well.
This is also a pitty
Is it really impossible to only update the propeties of a dir?
(because that is what i update, the properties so "children" of the dir not
the dir it self)
Problem is for me that i monitor a lot of co workers things. Now i do that
based
on changeset and i would lik to have changesets that are really complete as
possible for that
specific revision and update only really the files in that changeset and
nothing more.
In cvs this was some how easier to manage because the changesets are not so
mixed up
and you really update what you see there not suddenly much more.
So i am just wondering what we could improve in subclise. is everything
really just subversion
or can we improve the plugin?
johan
Received on 2008-11-11 15:17:00 CET