Re: [Subclipse-users] Bug report for unversioned decorations

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Daniel Scharfman <daniel123_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with you. A directory containing a modified, added, or deleted file
> *should* be shown as dirty. My complaint is that *unversioned* files
> trigger this behavior; unversioned files are treated as dirty.

I understand. As I said in the last reply, this behavior is
intentional. We had to write code to make it do that.

> For me, when I'm looking looking at highlights to see all of the changes,
> additions, and deletions that need to be committed to the repository, I find
> it very confusing when I also see that unversioned files are highlighted
> too.

OK, and others did not like that they could forget to commit new files
they created. If it was possible to make this a separate option so
you could choose we would have. Of course "anything is possible", but
adding an option for this would require major surgery.
Eclipse/Subclipse/Subversion provide many easy ways to ignore files.
So if you do not want to ever add/commit these items why are they not
ignored? Ignored files will not decorate the folders.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org