[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [Subclipse-users] Blame (annotate) issues in subclipse 1.4.3

From: Gene Gorokhovsky <ggorokhovsky_at_apriori.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:41:48 -0400

MP> When you tested from the command line are you 100% certain you used
the SVN 1.5.1 command line?

Yes. Here is the output of "svn --version"
svn, version 1.5.1 (r32289)
   compiled Jul 25 2008, 11:09:31

MP>Is there anything about your repository history
that could be triggering a bug? Such as the paths being moved/renamed
during their lifetime?

We did move paths a while back, and there were quite a few merges. The
blame kept working fine though until we went to 1.5 client.
After playing a bit, I was able to reproduce the issue from the command
line. It looks like "-g" flag (use merge history) triggers the failure.
So
svn blame -g -r 32937 AutomaticCastingDemo_L1Test.java_at_HEAD
failes, but
svn blame -r 32937 AutomaticCastingDemo_L1Test.java_at_HEAD
works as expected.
So this is svn's fault and not subclipse-s. It would be nice if
subclipse could fall back to ignoring merge history, but it does appear
that this needs to be pursued with the core svn team.
Should I still file a subclipse issue?

Gene

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-14 20:42:01 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.