[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] CollabNet Merge Client for Eclipse

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 08:14:45 -0400

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Jens Seidel <jensseidel_at_users.sf.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:20:40PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Jens Seidel <jensseidel_at_users.sf.net> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:55:34PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> >> No, it isn't. The merge client is part of the CollabNet Desktop. You
>> >> need a version of Eclipse 3.4 without Mylyn 3.0 since we currently
>> >> only support 2.x. The update site includes the latest 2.x version
>> >> with Eclipse 3.4 support.
>> >
>> > I also wonder about the merge client.
>> > Does this mean the merge client depends on non free software?
>> >
>> > A simple URL for the Eclipse update dialog would be much preferred to a
>> > software nobody knows and which is not free.
>> And it could also be that this is all still a work in progress.
> Ah, didn't know this (I ignored your "could") especially the Merge
> Client was so often mentioned in the last time.
>> Try this URL which will be more formally published soon:
>> http://desktop-eclipse.open.collab.net
> Thanks, I tried it but failed to resolve dependencies:
> Cannot complete the request. See the details.
> Unsatisfied dependency: [org.eclipse.jpa.nl_de 0.2.0.v20080603043401] requiredCapability: osgi.bundle/org.eclipse.jpa/[0.0.0,9.9.9)
> Unsatisfied dependency: [org.eclipse.m2t.nl_de 0.2.0.v20080603043401] requiredCapability: osgi.bundle/org.eclipse.m2t/[0.0.0,9.9.9)
> Unsatisfied dependency: [ejbtools.nl_de 0.2.0.v20080603043401] requiredCapability: osgi.bundle/ejbtools/[0.0.0,9.9.9)
> Unsatisfied dependency: [org.eclipse.text.tests.nl_de 0.2.0.v20080603043401] requiredCapability:
> osgi.bundle/org.eclipse.text.tests/[0.0.0,9.9.9)
> ....

That looks like one of those problems where your existing
configuration has the problem. We neither include nor depend on any
of those plugins. I do not have any of them even installed.

I've also noticed the new installer does a lot on the background and I
have found that trying it a second time it will often behave
differently. That said, usually the problems I saw were more
specifically related to what I was installing.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-02 14:14:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.