Re: [Subclipse-users] svn:externals

On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, CARASSO Felipe <Felipe.CARASSO@gemalto.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2007 5:27 PM, Randy Merrill <RSMerrill@cc.usu.edu> wrote:
> > > One thing that I noticed as a bug for the subclipse plugin is that
> > > when there are more than one external reference the first
> > is the only
> > > one displayed with an icon. The others have no icon at all.
> >
> > The limitation is in Subversion. Our decorators are based on
> > information we can obtain from Subversion. It gives weird
> > answers in various scenarios when svn:externals are used.
> > The current code is as good as it gets unless Subversion API
> > results change.
> (...)
>
> I don't see this problem on Subversive using SVNKit 1.1.4 r3484. You may like to
> try the same SVNKit revision with Subclipse and see if it changes anything.
>
> Here we have 2 svn:externals entries in the same directory and they all show the
> proper icon. See attachments.

Subclipse and JavaHL can handle it fine too (see attached). The
problem is that SVN is inconsistent on what it returns depending on
the scenario. I also thought the poster might actually be talking
about multi-level externals, which are different. In that case the
intermediate folders are consistently reported as unversioned, and
actually do not even contain a .svn folder.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org