[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 'svn ls' not consistent with w.c. status? (1.4.3)

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-06-06 19:08:49 CEST

Toby,

Subclipse does not actually touch your WC. We run Subversion API's.
Are you using JavaHL or SVNKit? Did you try the same thing using the
command line? If the command line and Subclipse give different
results after a commit, then that would point to a bug in either
JavaHL or SVNKit.

Given that JavaHL is running the same code as the command line, it
would be more likely to be a problem in SVNKit.

Mark

On 6/6/07, Toby Thain <toby@smartgames.ca> wrote:
>
> On 6-Jun-07, at 1:13 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
> > Toby Thain wrote:
> >> ... after committing r12 from this working copy (Subclipse), I tried:
> >> $ svn ls -v
> >> 2 emil 17987 Jun 02 12:41 GPL
> >> 11 emil 1136 Jun 05 19:00 Makefile
> >> 11 emil 1616 Jun 05 19:00 README
> >> 11 emil 2293 Jun 05 19:00 addr_calc.c
> >> 11 emil 5406 Jun 05 19:00 disasm.c
> >> 11 emil 6359 Jun 05 19:00 emul.c
> >> 11 emil 4718 Jun 05 19:00 in_out.c
> >> 11 emil 3046 Jun 05 19:00 loader.c
> >> 11 emil 1814 Jun 05 19:00 reg_flags.h
> >> 11 emil 1163 Jun 05 19:00 version.h
> >> I was surprised that none of the files updated in r12 were marked
> >> as such, so I did:
> >> $ svn up
> >> At revision 12.
> >> Then 'ls' showed what I expected:
> >> $ svn ls -v
> >> 2 emil 17987 Jun 02 12:41 GPL
> >> 12 toby 1140 Jun 05 20:40 Makefile
> >> 11 emil 1616 Jun 05 19:00 README
> >> 11 emil 2293 Jun 05 19:00 addr_calc.c
> >> 11 emil 5406 Jun 05 19:00 disasm.c
> >> 12 toby 6345 Jun 05 20:40 emul.c
> >> 12 toby 4786 Jun 05 20:40 in_out.c
> >> 12 toby 3128 Jun 05 20:40 loader.c
> >> 11 emil 1814 Jun 05 19:00 reg_flags.h
> >> 11 emil 1163 Jun 05 19:00 version.h
> >> Is this normal behaviour?
> >
> > Yes, you never pull updates down from the server for files that
> > were not committed.
>
> I realise; but this doesn't explain to me the behaviour above. The 4
> files comprising r12 were *just committed* in this same working copy,
> and I don't understand why 'svn ls' did not reflect that.
>
> --Toby
>
> >
> > See the mixed revision working copy portion of the Svn boko.
> >
> > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.2/svn.basic.in-
> > action.html#svn.basic.in-action.mixedrevs
> >
> > Regards,
> > Blair
> >
> > --
> > Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
> > Subversion training, consulting and support
> > http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 6 19:08:59 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.