[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[Subclipse-users] RE : [Subclipse-users] RE : [Subclipse-users] RE : RE : [Subclipse-users] Commit window

From: MATHUS Baptiste <mathus.b_at_mipih.fr>
Date: 2007-05-01 22:02:59 CEST

-------- Message d'origine--------
De: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip@gmail.com]
Date: mar. 01/05/2007 21:24
À: users@subclipse.tigris.org
Objet : Re: [Subclipse-users] RE : [Subclipse-users] RE : RE : [Subclipse-users] Commit window
 
On 5/1/07, MATHUS Baptiste <mathus.b@mipih.fr> wrote:
> > As I'm under Linux, I can't test the behaviour. Could you have a look at how TortoiseSvn behaves and how Subclipse behaves for you at the moment:
> >
> > * If tsvn:logwidthmarker is not set (or set at 0, which is the same in the code) on the root, but say you set "20" on a pouet subpackage. If I commit something under pouet, would it display the vertical rule?
> >
> > To sum up, how should be recursively treated the recursive value of this svn property?
>
> When we retrieve those properties we only recurse up towards the root
> of the hierarchy. I'd imagine the recursion is already handled behing
> a method and you do not need to know about it. Can't you just call
> the method to get the value and condition the code on whether it
> returns a 0?

Yes, sure. That's what I'm doing. Even if it's not behaving correctly, I'll stay behind this method. But I was asking the question from a more general point of view on the behaviour for this feature.

Cheers,
-- Baptiste

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org

Received on Tue May 1 22:03:14 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.